ze blog of ankur banerjee

needlessly messianic articles written by ankur banerjee on anything that catches his fancy, which is quite a lot indeed - stuff like tech, quizzing, h2g2 - and cups of filthy liquid almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea


Psst! Now you can get updates on articles posted to this blog through email.


My own star in the sky!

Filed Under (Needlessly Messianic) by Ankur on 29-10-2005


I’m now a star in the sky, literally! A friend of mine sent me an invitation for a star to be named after me, so I accepted. This star is in the constellation of Cancer (the Crab) and I’ve named it the ‘Great Quizzard’s Star’ (the one circled with a red bullet). Pretty tiny, isn’t it, but then I hope this’ll make me ‘eternal’. The name has been OFFICIALLY registered (although I don’t know the legal validity of it).

Click here to name your own star!

Google Site Search

Filed Under (Google-y, Tech Takes) by Ankur on 21-10-2005

It seems that Google Site Search has not indexed my site yet, so till the time the situation is rectified, please use the Yahoo! Search box for site search. For normal web search, you can always use the Google search box.

My old avatar

Filed Under (Needlessly Messianic) by Ankur on 15-10-2005


Just thought that I will reload my old avatar, in case you liked the old ‘un. Isn’t it amazing? You too could get a cyborg avatar like this at www.cyborgnamegenerator.com

Google or Yahoo! - Which search engine is better?

Filed Under (Google-y, Reviews, Tech Takes, Yahoo-niverse) by Ankur on 12-10-2005

A pretty vexing question, isn’t it? Reams of newsprint and kilobytes of data have been written on this and my blog entry is going to join the list now. This isn’t the final answer, and never will be.

So which one is better (according to me, of course)? I have noticed a few things. Google takes longer time to crawl (i.e., index) pages, compared to Yahoo!. Also, among pages already indexed, I have noticed that Yahoo! Search crawls even lesser known pages pretty frequently. Just having a bigger index (Google’s claim) I think, is not reason enough to crawl slowly. As a user I expect updated results. Many users don’t know that searches are not current, but have been indexed earlier. In this era of ever changing information, this is very crucial.

Going on to the searches themselves, Yahoo! Search has more variety than Google. I’ll discuss this later on. Yahoo! sends back results faster than Google. Its ‘My Web’ is great way to tag sites while searching. Also, I find Yahoo! Search’s results much more relevant to my query than Google. Actually, this may be due to Google’s early success; people use search engine optimization technology fine-tuned to come higher in the order of results on Google.

Currently, I think that Yahoo!’s development projects in beta, like ‘My Web’, Y!Q, Audio, Video, Subscriptions, Creative Commons, etc. are more required by users than Google’s.

Coming back to add-on searches, Yahoo! Photo Search is miles ahead of Google’s. It offers more ways to filter results and also gives back more and relevant results. Google pales in comparison, although I must praise its adult-filter for working properly, unlike Yahoo! which sometimes shows results you wouldn’t want a child to see even on innocent queries like ‘Greenpeace’.

Talking about video search, I think nobody disputes that Yahoo! Video Search is oodles better, in terms of volume and quality.

Right now, my vote goes to Yahoo! - Yahoo!! Search is much better than Google.

Think differently? Then go ahead and add your comments!

Subscribe to Rss Feed : Rss