<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boost Mobile with unlimited plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ankurb.info/2010/01/28/boost-mobile-with-unlimited-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ankurb.info/2010/01/28/boost-mobile-with-unlimited-plan/</link>
	<description>ankur banerjee&#039;s weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankur</title>
		<link>http://www.ankurb.info/2010/01/28/boost-mobile-with-unlimited-plan/#comment-9172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ankurb.info/?p=2926#comment-9172</guid>
		<description>Boost Mobile&#039;s target audience is teens and young adults, who might use more of texting (which is cheap for the operator to carry) and less of Internet traffic (mostly Facebook, again, a mostly text site). Therefore I think this subsidiary of Sprint is able to offer a lower monthly plan price to its customers. Basically, it&#039;s a gamble that since they&#039;re targetting a different demographics, they can offer a lower price since the usage patterns are different. Only my assumption though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boost Mobile&#8217;s target audience is teens and young adults, who might use more of texting (which is cheap for the operator to carry) and less of Internet traffic (mostly Facebook, again, a mostly text site). Therefore I think this subsidiary of Sprint is able to offer a lower monthly plan price to its customers. Basically, it&#8217;s a gamble that since they&#8217;re targetting a different demographics, they can offer a lower price since the usage patterns are different. Only my assumption though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.ankurb.info/2010/01/28/boost-mobile-with-unlimited-plan/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ankurb.info/?p=2926#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>As a Sprint customer, I sometimes think I made the wrong choice when I didn&#039;t decide to go with Boost Mobile - I&#039;m paying $99 instead of $50 and I have a contract to contend with as well. What I don&#039;t understand is why there would be such a difference of price between companies on the same network. Obviously, Sprint is interested in grabbing new, short term customers rather than keeping older, contract carriers - totally unfair. I think its time to let Sprint&#039;s President know how unfair this practice is - http://sites.google.com/site/sprintcustomersunite/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Sprint customer, I sometimes think I made the wrong choice when I didn&#8217;t decide to go with Boost Mobile &#8211; I&#8217;m paying $99 instead of $50 and I have a contract to contend with as well. What I don&#8217;t understand is why there would be such a difference of price between companies on the same network. Obviously, Sprint is interested in grabbing new, short term customers rather than keeping older, contract carriers &#8211; totally unfair. I think its time to let Sprint&#8217;s President know how unfair this practice is &#8211; <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/sprintcustomersunite/" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/sprintcustomersunite/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

